Saturday, May 11, 2019

Hooters restaurants need to just admit its adult entertainment and ban Essay

Hooters restaurants need to just admit its heavy(p) entertainment and ban children after 9pm. Agree or disagree - Essay Examplesolely in the todays times where a lot of insight and literature is uncommitted on product line ethics, empowered by forces such as the media and civilian Watchdogs ignorance is indeed not an excuse. Most of the literature available on ethics is dominated by rhetoric without accommodating the everyday practical situations that businesses deal with and without an decent framework. There is too a wide array of ethical theories and explanations that are present, each one guardianship a particular merit, but the lack of uniformity and coherence makes it hard to standardize or settle down on a single formula or framework to deal with such issues. Thus, this paper aims to critically assess an Ethical dilemma with a very objective outlook. This paper aims to systematically present the task backed by facts and then present a legal and ethical analysis of the facts, without a twine towards either side. And ultimately victimisation this analysis to present a very carefully constructed judgment. mend increase globalization has opened up many new market places for trade, it has also increased competition among businesses to capture market share. Competition is naturally deemed as healthy, but it can also lead to practices that circumvent the existing socioethical military position quos and thus lead to ethical dilemmas. 1 (Richard M. Locke, 2002) As per observations, increased competition leads to firms looking up for newer and to a greater extent innovative ways to differentiate their products and services. Hooters, an American chain of fast food restaurants, is another such friendship that has made the use of a rather unconventional and unorthodox medium of differentiating itself, which in its case is distaff sex appeal. This strategy has been a source of debate and objection from many different circles but has also been successfu l in creating a market for Hooters. The extent of success and objections differs from place to place depending upon the demographic typography of the respective locations. Our aim is to explore the many ways in which this eatery operates, analyze the potential sources of objection using legal and ethical notions and then ultimately form a judgment in context of prescriptive ethics regarding what Hooters ought to do. To be specific, this paper will ultimately analyze the validity of the claim that Hooters is indeed an mature entertainment provider operating under the garb of a traditional fast food restaurant, and should hence disallow the entry of children after 9 p.m. as per the usual legal norms. SUMMARY OVERVIEW Hooters, since its inception in 1983 has openly admitted to using female sex appeal as a unique selling proposition. While doing this lies within its legal jurisdiction as protected by the American constitution and other political science laws throughout the world, th e crux of the debate regarding Hooters lies in the company not classifying itself as an adult service provider. But once it does so, its market will be constricted mainly to adults, and this is what the company doesnt want. The main attractive force of the Hooters franchise are the Hooters Girls. The Hooters Girls are usually young, attractive females wearing a standard required uniform, the highlighting of which is a White Hooters tank top and orange shorts. The clothes are meant to enhance the attraction of the body, but strictly without any nudity. The Hooters Girls are supposed to entertain and interact with the customers as part of the Hooters

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.